These are the same settings that you chose when you took the photo. Because in the camera manufacturers software you will see the raw file with the camera manufacturer's settings. So, if you like what you see in your camera and you don't want to do it all over again, please consider opening the raw file in the camera manufacturers software. When shooting in raw and capturing the photo the way you the photographer want it in your camera, you are seeing the camera manufacturers settings. You will see your photos the way you saw them in camera, when you shoot in raw and import and view your photos in the manufacturers software. It's bog-standard Raw processing, and the exact same thing happens with Capture One Pro DxO Optics Pro Photo Ninja and any other third party converter, So not just down to "Adobe anything". Not using the in-camera settings is not "trashing" them. To characterise this as "trashing" is (and I'm being kind here) either disingenuous or naive. How many times does this need be explained? Lr doesn't "trash" anything: it simply shows you the unadjusted Raw image. For those of us with high standards, your suggestions just don't hack it.Įveryone already knows that Adobe anything trashes the color and other settings attached to the raw file, right?Įxcept that they don't. I know you've got "Photo" in your site name, which is doubtless supposed to imply all sorts of important things about your credentials on the subject, but maybe your standards aren't as high as other people's. So here's the thing: you can either have OK results, easily, by following your "advice" or you can have much better than OK, just as easily, by setting up Lr to do what you want from your images, and converting them in Lr. If you can't do better than the camera, you probably should stick to shooting jpeg. The whole point of shooting Raw is that we know better than the camera maker, what looks right to us. Oh - and care to show me where it says that an arbitrary decision by a camera manufacturer's member of staff about what looks "right" is the definitive "best" the image can look? So - lucky you - you can choose to use Lr or the manufacturer's software. It also works correctly in Photoshop 2015 CC on the same 32 bit PCĮxcept that the manufacturers software does not trash the original color settings attached to the raw file. There must be a hidden "feature" or setting (which I cannot find) or a bug.īut it works properly with Lightroom 5.5 on a 32 bit PC. No way the new 64 bit version of LR and Photoshop treat raw data better than the older versions. In short: the new 64 bit raw conversion is in many cases unusable. On the new pc, with some lighting conditions or subjects, MANY photo's appearr much worse after the brief jpg review. On the old pc, the slight differences in color between the brief jpg preview and then the raw NEVER bothered me. On the new PC, the files where it happens are ready for the garbage bin. On the old PC, the colors are still different from the as-shot jpg, but I can work and get close (or better) My new PC (lightroom CC latest version) has strange issues with intense darker red (it appears pixelated with a 100% purple hue). not anymore by changing my Lightroom default to Camera Landscape.Īn older 32 bit PC changes things a bit less. After a few seconds Lightroom loads the default settings for the RAW file and that look that the Landscape image style has is gone. the embedded thumbnail/jpg preview is with that Landscape image style. I have my Canon 5D Mark iii set to Landscape image style pretty much all the time in the camera settings. Hold alt and click set default near bottom right where it usually says reset. You'll find this under the camera calibration tab in Develop mode. I've noticed a significant shift in speed and I'm not dealing with the shift in the image looking good for 2 seconds and then shifting to Adobe Standard Profile. I set the default settings in LR for the camera profile to "Camera Landscape". I changed my default settings to have the camera profile in sync with the image style I shoot with most. I have found a little solution as I've experienced the same thing.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |